How independent is “the science” we hear about in times of crisis? Marta Podemska-Mikluch
(Business and Economics) has co-authored a new peer-reviewed article in Public Choice titled “Bespoke
science: the use of ad hoc scientific advisory committees in the Covid-19 pandemic.” The paper
examines how six countries—Italy, the UK, the US, Poland, Uganda, and Sweden—organized
scientific advice during COVID-19.
The authors find that in high-uncertainty crises, governments often prefer temporary, tailor-made
advisory bodies over standing institutions. These “ad hoc” committees can be shaped through
selective membership or narrowly defined mandates, making them easier to align with political
priorities—regardless of which party is in power.
By comparing pandemic responses in different political and institutional contexts, the study
shows that the politicization of science is not unique to any ideology or region. It also invites
broader reflection on how to design scientific advisory structures that preserve independence
while remaining responsive in emergencies.